8/24/2023 0 Comments Intel gpus![]() If you've ever heard of "the way it's meant to be grilled," this is what it was referring to. In Anandtech's testing, the card consumed well over 200W under load and hit over 90 degrees Celsius. And that was just the literally terrible price it got even more expensive considering the 480's massive power draw. The 480 did reclaim the crown with a 10% lead over the Radeon HD 5870, but at a terrible price: $500, compared to the 5870's $380. The end result was Nvidia's worst technological blunder ever: Fermi, which powered the GTX 480.īecause the 400 series had to be delayed due to those difficulties, AMD had taken the performance crown from Nvidia with its Radeon HD 5000 series in late 2009 and held it for six months. ![]() It was trying to make a massive GPU on TSMC's 40nm, which was sort of broken. But by 2010, things were getting more complicated, particularly for Nvidia. It was pretty common to see next-generation GPUs beat their predecessors by over 50%, and 100% or more wasn't rare. In the decade following the emergence of the modern graphics card, there actually weren't too many bad ones, and when there were, they had a minimal impact since the industry was moving so quickly back then.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |